managing-third-party-vendor-risk skill (Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills)
- Install
- SKILL.md (verbatim)
- When to Use
- Prerequisites
- Workflow
- 1. Inventory and classify vendors
- 2. Tier by inherent risk
- 3. Run tier-appropriate due diligence
- 4. Review evidence critically
- 5. Identify gaps and decide
- 6. Codify in the contract / DPA
- 7. Monitor continuously
- 8. Manage Nth-party and concentration risk
- 9. Offboard securely
- Key Concepts
- Tools & Systems
- Common Scenarios
- Output Format
- Other files in this skill
- assets/template.md (verbatim)
- 1. Vendor Profile
- 2. Inherent-Risk Tier
- 3. Due Diligence Performed
- 4. Findings
- 5. Decision & Residual Risk
- 6. Contractual Requirements
- 7. Monitoring & Reassessment Plan
- 8. Nth-Party / Concentration Notes
- references/standards.md (verbatim)
- Primary standards & frameworks
- NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC subcategories (selected)
- Vendor tiering — typical inherent-risk factors
- Due-diligence instruments
- Reading a SOC 2 critically
- Contractual security terms to require
- Continuous monitoring signals
- Nth-party & concentration risk
What it does. Build and run a third-party/vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST SP 800-161 C-SCRM: inventory and tier vendors, issue SIG/CAIQ questionnaires, review SOC 2/ISO 27001 evidence, set contractual right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors continuously, and offboard securely. Use when assessing a new vendor, standing up a vendor-risk program, tiering a portfolio, reviewing a SOC 2/CAIQ, or writing security terms into a contract. Part of mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (817 security skills) (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills).
| Upstream | mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills |
| Skill file | skills/managing-third-party-vendor-risk/SKILL.md |
| License | Apache-2.0 (skill folder LICENSE) |
| Author | mukul975 |
| Fetched | 2026-09-10 |
Install
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill managing-third-party-vendor-risk, or copy the skill folder into~/.claude/skills/managing-third-party-vendor-risk/.- Raw file:
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/HEAD/skills/managing-third-party-vendor-risk/SKILL.md
SKILL.md (verbatim)
name: managing-third-party-vendor-risk
description: >-
Build and run a third-party/vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST SP
800-161 C-SCRM: inventory and tier vendors, issue SIG/CAIQ questionnaires, review
SOC 2/ISO 27001 evidence, set contractual right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors
continuously, and offboard securely. Use when assessing a new vendor, standing up a
vendor-risk program, tiering a portfolio, reviewing a SOC 2/CAIQ, or writing security
terms into a contract.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: compliance-governance
tags:
- third-party-risk
- vendor-risk-management
- tprm
- supply-chain-risk
- c-scrm
- nist-800-161
- soc2
- caiq
- continuous-monitoring
- governance
version: "1.0"
author: andrewibrah
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- GV.SC-01
- GV.SC-04
- GV.SC-06
- GV.SC-07
- ID.RA-05
- GV.OC-03
mitre_attack:
- T1199
- T1195
- T1078
- T1190
- T1567
Managing Third-Party Vendor Risk
When to Use
- When assessing a new vendor before onboarding, especially one that will handle sensitive data, connect to your network, or be embedded in a critical process.
- When standing up or maturing a third-party risk management (TPRM) program and you need a repeatable tiering + assessment workflow.
- When tiering an existing vendor portfolio so effort matches risk.
- When reviewing vendor evidence — a SOC 2 Type II report, ISO 27001 certificate, CAIQ, or pen-test summary — and you need to know what to look for.
- When writing security and privacy requirements into a contract / DPA, including breach-notification SLAs and right-to-audit.
- When a vendor (or their subcontractor) suffers a breach and you must assess exposure.
- When managing software supply-chain and Nth-party (fourth-party and beyond) risk.
Prerequisites
- A vendor inventory (who you use, for what, and what data/access each has).
- A defined risk-tiering model (criteria and thresholds) agreed with the business.
- Access to standardized questionnaires (Shared Assessments SIG, CSA CAIQ) and a way to collect evidence.
- Clarity on your own regulatory obligations that flow down to vendors (e.g., HIPAA BAAs, CMMC flowdown, GDPR processor terms, PCI).
- Stakeholders identified: procurement, legal, security, data owner, and the business sponsor.
Workflow
1. Inventory and classify vendors
Catalog every third party and capture: data sensitivity handled, type of access (network, physical, none), business criticality, and regulatory scope. You cannot manage what you have not inventoried — shadow vendors are a common blind spot.
2. Tier by inherent risk
Score each vendor on inherent-risk factors (data sensitivity, access, criticality, regulatory scope, spend/concentration) and assign a tier (e.g., Critical / High / Moderate / Low). The tier drives how deep the assessment goes and how often you reassess. A payroll processor with PII and system access is not the same risk as a stock-photo subscription.
3. Run tier-appropriate due diligence
- Critical/High: full SIG (or SIG Core), request SOC 2 Type II and/or ISO 27001, recent pen-test summary, and evidence of an incident-response capability. Consider an assessor call.
- Moderate: SIG Lite or CAIQ, plus key attestations.
- Low: lightweight questionnaire / self-attestation.
4. Review evidence critically
Don't just collect — read:
- SOC 2 Type II: check scope, the Trust Services Criteria covered, the audit period (not just the date), and especially the exceptions/deviations and any qualified opinion. A clean cover page can hide noted exceptions.
- ISO 27001: confirm the scope statement and the Statement of Applicability actually cover the service you're buying.
- CAIQ: look for "no" answers and CCM domains left blank.
- Pen-test: age, scope, and whether highs/criticals were remediated.
5. Identify gaps and decide
Compare findings against your control requirements. For each gap: accept, require remediation (with a date), add a compensating control on your side, or walk away. Record the residual risk and a risk-owner decision.
6. Codify in the contract / DPA
Bake requirements into the agreement: security control obligations, breach-notification timeline, data-handling and return/destruction terms, right-to-audit / right to assessment evidence, subcontractor (Nth-party) flowdown, and liability/insurance. Contracts are where TPRM gets teeth.
7. Monitor continuously
Tiering is not a one-time gate. For higher tiers: periodic reassessment, security-ratings feeds, breach/news monitoring, certificate-expiry tracking, and watching for material changes (acquisition, region change, new subprocessors). Re-tier on change.
8. Manage Nth-party and concentration risk
Map critical fourth parties (your vendor's key subprocessors) and watch for concentration (many vendors riding on the same upstream provider) — a single upstream outage or breach can hit your whole portfolio at once.
9. Offboard securely
On termination: revoke access and credentials, confirm data return or certified destruction, remove integrations/API keys, and update the inventory. Un-offboarded vendors are standing risk.
Key Concepts
| Concept | Definition |
|---|---|
| Inherent risk | Risk a vendor poses before controls — drives tiering. |
| Residual risk | Risk remaining after the vendor's (and your) controls. |
| Vendor tier | Risk band (Critical/High/Moderate/Low) setting assessment depth and cadence. |
| SIG | Shared Assessments Standardized Information Gathering questionnaire (full / Lite / Core). |
| CAIQ | CSA Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (maps to the Cloud Controls Matrix). |
| SOC 2 Type II | Attestation on control design and operating effectiveness over a period. |
| Right to audit | Contractual right to assess the vendor or obtain assessment evidence. |
| Nth-party / fourth-party | Your vendor's vendors (and beyond) — indirect supply-chain risk. |
| Concentration risk | Many vendors depending on the same upstream provider. |
| C-SCRM | Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (NIST SP 800-161). |
Tools & Systems
- NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 — Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management practices.
- NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC — the supply-chain risk-management category (program backbone).
- Shared Assessments SIG and CSA CAIQ / STAR registry — standardized questionnaires.
- SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / PCI AOC / pen-test reports — vendor evidence.
- Security-ratings services (e.g., BitSight/SecurityScorecard-style) — continuous external signal.
- TPRM platforms — OneTrust, ProcessUnity, Prevalent, ServiceNow VRM, etc., to manage the workflow and inventory.
- GDPR DPA / HIPAA BAA / CMMC flowdown — regulatory contract instruments.
Common Scenarios
- New SaaS onboarding. Tier it, send the right questionnaire, read the SOC 2 exceptions, set contract terms, then approve with documented residual risk.
- Portfolio has 400 vendors, no tiers. Tier first; concentrate assessment effort on the Critical/High tail rather than spreading thin.
- Vendor breach in the news. Pull the vendor record, assess data/access exposure, invoke the breach-notification clause, and require a post-incident report.
- Auditor asks for your TPRM program. Show the tiering model, the assessment cadence, and evidence of continuous monitoring mapped to GV.SC.
- Critical fourth party identified. Document the dependency and the concentration risk; build a contingency for that upstream provider.
Output Format
Produce a Vendor Risk Assessment using assets/template.md, containing:
- Vendor profile — service, data handled, access type, business criticality, regulatory scope.
- Inherent-risk tier — score and resulting tier, with rationale.
- Due-diligence performed — questionnaire used and evidence collected (SOC 2 period, ISO scope, pen-test age).
- Findings — gaps with severity, including notable SOC 2 exceptions.
- Decision & residual risk — approve/conditional/reject, with risk-owner sign-off.
- Contractual requirements — security terms, breach SLA, right-to-audit, subprocessor flowdown.
- Monitoring & reassessment plan — cadence, signals watched, re-tier triggers.
- Nth-party notes — critical subprocessors and concentration risk.
Use scripts/process.py to compute a vendor's inherent-risk tier from a profile JSON, set the assessment depth and reassessment cadence, and flag missing evidence for the assigned tier.
Other files in this skill
assets/template.md (verbatim)
Vendor Risk Assessment — Worked Example
Filled example for a payroll-processing vendor (regulated PII, deep integration). Replace bracketed content for your own vendor.
1. Vendor Profile
- Vendor: PayWorks
- Service: Payroll processing (SaaS)
- Data handled: Employee PII, bank details (regulated).
- Access type: System access (API + SSO into HRIS).
- Business criticality: High — a multi-day outage would block payroll.
- Regulatory scope: PII / state payroll requirements.
2. Inherent-Risk Tier
(scored by scripts/process.py)
| Factor | Value | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Data sensitivity | regulated | 4 |
| Access | system | 4 |
| Criticality | high | 4 |
| Integration | deep | 2 |
| Regulated scope | PII | 2 |
| Concentration | single payroll source | 1 |
| Total | 17 → Tier: Critical |
Rationale: regulated data + system access + high criticality place this in the top tier; assess deeply and monitor continuously.
3. Due Diligence Performed
- Questionnaire: Full SIG requested.
- SOC 2: Type II, 12-month period obtained.
- ISO 27001: Certificate obtained — scope statement confirmed to cover the payroll service.
- Pen-test: Summary from 5 months ago; highs/criticals remediated.
4. Findings
| Finding | Severity | Note |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 exception: one quarter of incomplete access reviews | Moderate | Vendor provided remediation evidence; accept with monitoring |
| No customer-managed encryption keys | Low | Within risk tolerance for this data set |
| Two critical fourth parties (cloud + email) | Info | Concentration noted (see §8) |
The SOC 2 cover page was clean — the exception was found in the body. Always read the deviations and CUECs.
5. Decision & Residual Risk
- Decision: Approve — Conditional.
- Condition: Vendor confirms completion of the access-review remediation within 60 days.
- Residual risk: Moderate, accepted by [data owner / risk owner], [date].
6. Contractual Requirements
- Security obligations mapped to our baseline (encryption, access control, logging).
- Breach notification within 48 hours of discovery.
- Data return / certified destruction within 30 days of termination.
- Right to audit or to receive a current SOC 2 annually.
- Subprocessor flowdown + prior notice of new subprocessors.
- Cyber-insurance minimum and liability terms.
- DPA executed (PII processing).
7. Monitoring & Reassessment Plan
- Cadence: Full reassessment annually (Critical tier).
- Continuous signals: security-ratings feed, breach/news monitoring, SOC 2 / ISO expiry tracking.
- Re-tier triggers: ownership change, new region/subprocessor, material breach, scope expansion.
8. Nth-Party / Concentration Notes
- Critical fourth parties: cloud IaaS provider and transactional email provider (from the SOC 2 subservice list).
- Concentration risk: our HRIS and PayWorks both ride the same cloud region — a single regional outage hits payroll and HR together. Contingency: documented manual-payroll fallback for one cycle.
references/standards.md (verbatim)
Third-Party / Vendor Risk Management — Standards & Reference
Primary standards & frameworks
| Source | Role |
|---|---|
| NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 (May 2022) | Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) practices for systems and organizations. URL: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/161/r1/final |
| NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC | The Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management category; the governance backbone for a TPRM program. |
| NIST SP 800-37 / 800-53 (SR family) | Supply Chain Risk Management controls (SR-x) within the broader control catalog. |
| ISO/IEC 27036 | Information security for supplier relationships. |
| Shared Assessments | SIG questionnaire + Third Party Risk Management framework. |
| CSA CAIQ / Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) / STAR | Cloud-vendor self-assessment and registry. |
NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC subcategories (selected)
| ID | Outcome |
|---|---|
| GV.SC-01 | A cyber supply-chain risk-management program/strategy is established and agreed. |
| GV.SC-03 | Supply-chain risk management is integrated into cybersecurity and ERM. |
| GV.SC-04 | Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality. |
| GV.SC-05 | Requirements to address supply-chain risk are established in contracts. |
| GV.SC-06 | Due diligence is performed to reduce risk before entering relationships. |
| GV.SC-07 | Supplier risks are understood, monitored, and managed over the relationship. |
| GV.SC-08 | Suppliers are included in incident planning, response, and recovery. |
| GV.SC-10 | Supply-chain risk is managed through to relationship termination. |
Vendor tiering — typical inherent-risk factors
- Data sensitivity handled (regulated PII/PHI/CHD, IP, none).
- Access type (network/system access, physical access, none).
- Business criticality (would an outage stop operations?).
- Regulatory scope (HIPAA, PCI, GDPR, CMMC flowdown).
- Integration depth (API/identity federation vs standalone).
- Concentration / spend (single-source, large dependency).
Tiers commonly: Critical / High / Moderate / Low — each mapped to an assessment depth and a reassessment cadence.
Due-diligence instruments
| Instrument | What it is |
|---|---|
| SIG (Full / Core / Lite) | Shared Assessments standardized questionnaire; depth scales with tier. |
| CAIQ | CSA questionnaire mapped to the Cloud Controls Matrix. |
| SOC 2 Type II | AICPA attestation on control design and operating effectiveness over a period (Trust Services Criteria: Security required; Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy optional). |
| SOC 2 Type I | Design only, at a point in time (weaker assurance than Type II). |
| ISO/IEC 27001 certificate + SoA | Certified ISMS; check the scope statement covers the purchased service. |
| Penetration-test summary | Independent testing; check age, scope, and remediation of highs/criticals. |
| PCI AOC | Attestation of Compliance for card-data handlers. |
Reading a SOC 2 critically
- Confirm the report type (II > I) and the audit period length.
- Check the scope / system description matches the service you buy.
- Read the exceptions / deviations and the auditor's opinion (unqualified vs qualified).
- Review complementary user-entity controls (CUECs) — what the vendor expects you to do.
- Note the subservice organizations (their critical fourth parties).
Contractual security terms to require
- Security control obligations (map to your baseline).
- Breach-notification timeline (e.g., notify within X hours of discovery).
- Data handling, location, and return/certified destruction on exit.
- Right to audit or to receive current assessment evidence.
- Subcontractor (Nth-party) flowdown and prior-approval of new subprocessors.
- Liability, indemnity, and cyber-insurance requirements.
- Regulatory instruments: DPA (GDPR), BAA (HIPAA), CMMC flowdown.
Continuous monitoring signals
Security-ratings feeds, breach/news monitoring, certificate/attestation expiry, new subprocessor notices, ownership/region changes, and periodic re-questionnaire on cadence by tier.
Nth-party & concentration risk
- Fourth-party = your vendor's vendors; map the critical ones.
- Concentration risk = many vendors depending on the same upstream (e.g., one cloud region or one auth provider) — a single upstream failure can be systemic.
Back to mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (817 security skills) or Agent skills.