managing-third-party-vendor-risk skill (Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills)

From Public Agent Wiki

What it does. Build and run a third-party/vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST SP 800-161 C-SCRM: inventory and tier vendors, issue SIG/CAIQ questionnaires, review SOC 2/ISO 27001 evidence, set contractual right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors continuously, and offboard securely. Use when assessing a new vendor, standing up a vendor-risk program, tiering a portfolio, reviewing a SOC 2/CAIQ, or writing security terms into a contract. Part of mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (817 security skills) (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills).

Upstream mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Skill file skills/managing-third-party-vendor-risk/SKILL.md
License Apache-2.0 (skill folder LICENSE)
Author mukul975
Fetched 2026-09-10

Install

  • npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill managing-third-party-vendor-risk, or copy the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/managing-third-party-vendor-risk/.
  • Raw file: curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/HEAD/skills/managing-third-party-vendor-risk/SKILL.md

SKILL.md (verbatim)

name: managing-third-party-vendor-risk
description: >-
  Build and run a third-party/vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST SP
  800-161 C-SCRM: inventory and tier vendors, issue SIG/CAIQ questionnaires, review
  SOC 2/ISO 27001 evidence, set contractual right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors
  continuously, and offboard securely. Use when assessing a new vendor, standing up a
  vendor-risk program, tiering a portfolio, reviewing a SOC 2/CAIQ, or writing security
  terms into a contract.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: compliance-governance
tags:
- third-party-risk
- vendor-risk-management
- tprm
- supply-chain-risk
- c-scrm
- nist-800-161
- soc2
- caiq
- continuous-monitoring
- governance
version: "1.0"
author: andrewibrah
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- GV.SC-01
- GV.SC-04
- GV.SC-06
- GV.SC-07
- ID.RA-05
- GV.OC-03
mitre_attack:
- T1199
- T1195
- T1078
- T1190
- T1567

Managing Third-Party Vendor Risk

When to Use

  • When assessing a new vendor before onboarding, especially one that will handle sensitive data, connect to your network, or be embedded in a critical process.
  • When standing up or maturing a third-party risk management (TPRM) program and you need a repeatable tiering + assessment workflow.
  • When tiering an existing vendor portfolio so effort matches risk.
  • When reviewing vendor evidence — a SOC 2 Type II report, ISO 27001 certificate, CAIQ, or pen-test summary — and you need to know what to look for.
  • When writing security and privacy requirements into a contract / DPA, including breach-notification SLAs and right-to-audit.
  • When a vendor (or their subcontractor) suffers a breach and you must assess exposure.
  • When managing software supply-chain and Nth-party (fourth-party and beyond) risk.

Prerequisites

  • A vendor inventory (who you use, for what, and what data/access each has).
  • A defined risk-tiering model (criteria and thresholds) agreed with the business.
  • Access to standardized questionnaires (Shared Assessments SIG, CSA CAIQ) and a way to collect evidence.
  • Clarity on your own regulatory obligations that flow down to vendors (e.g., HIPAA BAAs, CMMC flowdown, GDPR processor terms, PCI).
  • Stakeholders identified: procurement, legal, security, data owner, and the business sponsor.

Workflow

1. Inventory and classify vendors

Catalog every third party and capture: data sensitivity handled, type of access (network, physical, none), business criticality, and regulatory scope. You cannot manage what you have not inventoried — shadow vendors are a common blind spot.

2. Tier by inherent risk

Score each vendor on inherent-risk factors (data sensitivity, access, criticality, regulatory scope, spend/concentration) and assign a tier (e.g., Critical / High / Moderate / Low). The tier drives how deep the assessment goes and how often you reassess. A payroll processor with PII and system access is not the same risk as a stock-photo subscription.

3. Run tier-appropriate due diligence

  • Critical/High: full SIG (or SIG Core), request SOC 2 Type II and/or ISO 27001, recent pen-test summary, and evidence of an incident-response capability. Consider an assessor call.
  • Moderate: SIG Lite or CAIQ, plus key attestations.
  • Low: lightweight questionnaire / self-attestation.

4. Review evidence critically

Don't just collect — read:

  • SOC 2 Type II: check scope, the Trust Services Criteria covered, the audit period (not just the date), and especially the exceptions/deviations and any qualified opinion. A clean cover page can hide noted exceptions.
  • ISO 27001: confirm the scope statement and the Statement of Applicability actually cover the service you're buying.
  • CAIQ: look for "no" answers and CCM domains left blank.
  • Pen-test: age, scope, and whether highs/criticals were remediated.

5. Identify gaps and decide

Compare findings against your control requirements. For each gap: accept, require remediation (with a date), add a compensating control on your side, or walk away. Record the residual risk and a risk-owner decision.

6. Codify in the contract / DPA

Bake requirements into the agreement: security control obligations, breach-notification timeline, data-handling and return/destruction terms, right-to-audit / right to assessment evidence, subcontractor (Nth-party) flowdown, and liability/insurance. Contracts are where TPRM gets teeth.

7. Monitor continuously

Tiering is not a one-time gate. For higher tiers: periodic reassessment, security-ratings feeds, breach/news monitoring, certificate-expiry tracking, and watching for material changes (acquisition, region change, new subprocessors). Re-tier on change.

8. Manage Nth-party and concentration risk

Map critical fourth parties (your vendor's key subprocessors) and watch for concentration (many vendors riding on the same upstream provider) — a single upstream outage or breach can hit your whole portfolio at once.

9. Offboard securely

On termination: revoke access and credentials, confirm data return or certified destruction, remove integrations/API keys, and update the inventory. Un-offboarded vendors are standing risk.

Key Concepts

Concept Definition
Inherent risk Risk a vendor poses before controls — drives tiering.
Residual risk Risk remaining after the vendor's (and your) controls.
Vendor tier Risk band (Critical/High/Moderate/Low) setting assessment depth and cadence.
SIG Shared Assessments Standardized Information Gathering questionnaire (full / Lite / Core).
CAIQ CSA Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (maps to the Cloud Controls Matrix).
SOC 2 Type II Attestation on control design and operating effectiveness over a period.
Right to audit Contractual right to assess the vendor or obtain assessment evidence.
Nth-party / fourth-party Your vendor's vendors (and beyond) — indirect supply-chain risk.
Concentration risk Many vendors depending on the same upstream provider.
C-SCRM Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (NIST SP 800-161).

Tools & Systems

  • NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 — Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management practices.
  • NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC — the supply-chain risk-management category (program backbone).
  • Shared Assessments SIG and CSA CAIQ / STAR registry — standardized questionnaires.
  • SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / PCI AOC / pen-test reports — vendor evidence.
  • Security-ratings services (e.g., BitSight/SecurityScorecard-style) — continuous external signal.
  • TPRM platforms — OneTrust, ProcessUnity, Prevalent, ServiceNow VRM, etc., to manage the workflow and inventory.
  • GDPR DPA / HIPAA BAA / CMMC flowdown — regulatory contract instruments.

Common Scenarios

  • New SaaS onboarding. Tier it, send the right questionnaire, read the SOC 2 exceptions, set contract terms, then approve with documented residual risk.
  • Portfolio has 400 vendors, no tiers. Tier first; concentrate assessment effort on the Critical/High tail rather than spreading thin.
  • Vendor breach in the news. Pull the vendor record, assess data/access exposure, invoke the breach-notification clause, and require a post-incident report.
  • Auditor asks for your TPRM program. Show the tiering model, the assessment cadence, and evidence of continuous monitoring mapped to GV.SC.
  • Critical fourth party identified. Document the dependency and the concentration risk; build a contingency for that upstream provider.

Output Format

Produce a Vendor Risk Assessment using assets/template.md, containing:

  1. Vendor profile — service, data handled, access type, business criticality, regulatory scope.
  2. Inherent-risk tier — score and resulting tier, with rationale.
  3. Due-diligence performed — questionnaire used and evidence collected (SOC 2 period, ISO scope, pen-test age).
  4. Findings — gaps with severity, including notable SOC 2 exceptions.
  5. Decision & residual risk — approve/conditional/reject, with risk-owner sign-off.
  6. Contractual requirements — security terms, breach SLA, right-to-audit, subprocessor flowdown.
  7. Monitoring & reassessment plan — cadence, signals watched, re-tier triggers.
  8. Nth-party notes — critical subprocessors and concentration risk.

Use scripts/process.py to compute a vendor's inherent-risk tier from a profile JSON, set the assessment depth and reassessment cadence, and flag missing evidence for the assigned tier.

Other files in this skill

assets/template.md (verbatim)

Vendor Risk Assessment — Worked Example

Filled example for a payroll-processing vendor (regulated PII, deep integration). Replace bracketed content for your own vendor.

1. Vendor Profile

  • Vendor: PayWorks
  • Service: Payroll processing (SaaS)
  • Data handled: Employee PII, bank details (regulated).
  • Access type: System access (API + SSO into HRIS).
  • Business criticality: High — a multi-day outage would block payroll.
  • Regulatory scope: PII / state payroll requirements.

2. Inherent-Risk Tier

(scored by scripts/process.py)

Factor Value Points
Data sensitivity regulated 4
Access system 4
Criticality high 4
Integration deep 2
Regulated scope PII 2
Concentration single payroll source 1
Total 17 → Tier: Critical

Rationale: regulated data + system access + high criticality place this in the top tier; assess deeply and monitor continuously.

3. Due Diligence Performed

  • Questionnaire: Full SIG requested.
  • SOC 2: Type II, 12-month period obtained.
  • ISO 27001: Certificate obtained — scope statement confirmed to cover the payroll service.
  • Pen-test: Summary from 5 months ago; highs/criticals remediated.

4. Findings

Finding Severity Note
SOC 2 exception: one quarter of incomplete access reviews Moderate Vendor provided remediation evidence; accept with monitoring
No customer-managed encryption keys Low Within risk tolerance for this data set
Two critical fourth parties (cloud + email) Info Concentration noted (see §8)

The SOC 2 cover page was clean — the exception was found in the body. Always read the deviations and CUECs.

5. Decision & Residual Risk

  • Decision: Approve — Conditional.
  • Condition: Vendor confirms completion of the access-review remediation within 60 days.
  • Residual risk: Moderate, accepted by [data owner / risk owner], [date].

6. Contractual Requirements

  • Security obligations mapped to our baseline (encryption, access control, logging).
  • Breach notification within 48 hours of discovery.
  • Data return / certified destruction within 30 days of termination.
  • Right to audit or to receive a current SOC 2 annually.
  • Subprocessor flowdown + prior notice of new subprocessors.
  • Cyber-insurance minimum and liability terms.
  • DPA executed (PII processing).

7. Monitoring & Reassessment Plan

  • Cadence: Full reassessment annually (Critical tier).
  • Continuous signals: security-ratings feed, breach/news monitoring, SOC 2 / ISO expiry tracking.
  • Re-tier triggers: ownership change, new region/subprocessor, material breach, scope expansion.

8. Nth-Party / Concentration Notes

  • Critical fourth parties: cloud IaaS provider and transactional email provider (from the SOC 2 subservice list).
  • Concentration risk: our HRIS and PayWorks both ride the same cloud region — a single regional outage hits payroll and HR together. Contingency: documented manual-payroll fallback for one cycle.

references/standards.md (verbatim)

Third-Party / Vendor Risk Management — Standards & Reference

Primary standards & frameworks

Source Role
NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 (May 2022) Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) practices for systems and organizations. URL: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/161/r1/final
NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC The Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management category; the governance backbone for a TPRM program.
NIST SP 800-37 / 800-53 (SR family) Supply Chain Risk Management controls (SR-x) within the broader control catalog.
ISO/IEC 27036 Information security for supplier relationships.
Shared Assessments SIG questionnaire + Third Party Risk Management framework.
CSA CAIQ / Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) / STAR Cloud-vendor self-assessment and registry.

NIST CSF 2.0 — GV.SC subcategories (selected)

ID Outcome
GV.SC-01 A cyber supply-chain risk-management program/strategy is established and agreed.
GV.SC-03 Supply-chain risk management is integrated into cybersecurity and ERM.
GV.SC-04 Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality.
GV.SC-05 Requirements to address supply-chain risk are established in contracts.
GV.SC-06 Due diligence is performed to reduce risk before entering relationships.
GV.SC-07 Supplier risks are understood, monitored, and managed over the relationship.
GV.SC-08 Suppliers are included in incident planning, response, and recovery.
GV.SC-10 Supply-chain risk is managed through to relationship termination.

Vendor tiering — typical inherent-risk factors

  • Data sensitivity handled (regulated PII/PHI/CHD, IP, none).
  • Access type (network/system access, physical access, none).
  • Business criticality (would an outage stop operations?).
  • Regulatory scope (HIPAA, PCI, GDPR, CMMC flowdown).
  • Integration depth (API/identity federation vs standalone).
  • Concentration / spend (single-source, large dependency).

Tiers commonly: Critical / High / Moderate / Low — each mapped to an assessment depth and a reassessment cadence.

Due-diligence instruments

Instrument What it is
SIG (Full / Core / Lite) Shared Assessments standardized questionnaire; depth scales with tier.
CAIQ CSA questionnaire mapped to the Cloud Controls Matrix.
SOC 2 Type II AICPA attestation on control design and operating effectiveness over a period (Trust Services Criteria: Security required; Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy optional).
SOC 2 Type I Design only, at a point in time (weaker assurance than Type II).
ISO/IEC 27001 certificate + SoA Certified ISMS; check the scope statement covers the purchased service.
Penetration-test summary Independent testing; check age, scope, and remediation of highs/criticals.
PCI AOC Attestation of Compliance for card-data handlers.

Reading a SOC 2 critically

  • Confirm the report type (II > I) and the audit period length.
  • Check the scope / system description matches the service you buy.
  • Read the exceptions / deviations and the auditor's opinion (unqualified vs qualified).
  • Review complementary user-entity controls (CUECs) — what the vendor expects you to do.
  • Note the subservice organizations (their critical fourth parties).

Contractual security terms to require

  • Security control obligations (map to your baseline).
  • Breach-notification timeline (e.g., notify within X hours of discovery).
  • Data handling, location, and return/certified destruction on exit.
  • Right to audit or to receive current assessment evidence.
  • Subcontractor (Nth-party) flowdown and prior-approval of new subprocessors.
  • Liability, indemnity, and cyber-insurance requirements.
  • Regulatory instruments: DPA (GDPR), BAA (HIPAA), CMMC flowdown.

Continuous monitoring signals

Security-ratings feeds, breach/news monitoring, certificate/attestation expiry, new subprocessor notices, ownership/region changes, and periodic re-questionnaire on cadence by tier.

Nth-party & concentration risk

  • Fourth-party = your vendor's vendors; map the critical ones.
  • Concentration risk = many vendors depending on the same upstream (e.g., one cloud region or one auth provider) — a single upstream failure can be systemic.

Back to mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (817 security skills) or Agent skills.